home contact us search  
 
 
 


Historically, mainly students with Down syndrome have spent the majority of their school days segregated from the general education environment. Typically they were automatically placed in the most restrictive setting with no consideration of the general education environment, even though the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires such consideration and demonstrates a clear preference for inclusion when it states that a school district may not place a student with disabilities outside of a regular classroom "if educating the child in the regular clasroom, with supplementary aids and support services, can be achieved satisfactorily."

In recent years, however, dramatic changes have occurred. Students with Down syndrome are now experiencing success as members of age-appropriate general education classrooms with appropriate supports in their neighborhood schools.




There is no standard or official definition of inclusion. However, the National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion (NCERI) has developed the following working definition based upon extensive study of inclusive programs and consultation with educational leaders: "Providing to all students, including those with significant disabilities, equitable opportunities to receive effective educational services, with needed supplementary aids and support services, in age-appropriate classes in their neighborhood schools, in order to prepare students for productive lives as full members of society."




Implementation of "best practice" as supported by recent research findings indicates that children with Down syndrome benefit from education in general education classrooms when school districts provide to teachers, parents, and students the necessary conditions to yield quality education. These include:

A view of special education as a collection of supports and services delivered to children rather than as a particular place

Access to the resources and expertise of both general and special education

Removal of barriers, including funding, that are created by the operation of dual systems (both general and special education)

An attitude which reflects respect toward the student and the family and encourages their meaningful participation as members of the educational planning team

High expectations for all students as well as teachers who treat each student as a uniquely important individual

IEPs which are appropriately individualized to meet the unique needs of each student and are written and implemented collaboratively by the planning team, which includes parents as equal partners

Placement in the neighborhood school classroom to which the student would be assigned if he/she did not have a disability, with students of the same age

Access to the same academic curriculum, with or without adaptations, as students without disabilities

Proactive use of systematic and positive behavior support strategies

Access to assistive technology and the appropriate training to use it

Facilitiation and support for peer relationships and interactions using deliberate strategies

Careful planning and implementation of transitions from grade to grade, school to school, school to work, and school to higher education

An emphasis on staff development and training for all educators

Facilitation of interdependence and natural support networks in both school and community environments

Creation of a strong sense of community among students, staff, and parents




The movement toward quality inclusive schooling is fully consistent with current school reform and restructuring efforts and acknowledges the broad diversity of learning needs and styles among all students, with and without disabilities, as well as the critical importance of family involvement in achieving excellence in education. Research shows that inclusive education has a positive impact (both academic and social) on typical students as a result of increased contact and relationships with students with disabilities.

Many of the school reform initiatives, including those described below, are compatible and supportive of best practices in inclusive education:

Program philosophy which emphasizes the value of diversity, multiculturalism, social inclusion and belonging for everyone

Access for all students to campuses and classrooms, including co- curricular and extra-curricular activities, that are free from prejudice and other physical and psychological barriers

Comprehensive, sensible and culturally competent curricula which are effective for the full range of learners

Thorough analysis of the learning needs of all students

Broad use of unbiased and culturally sensitive assessment procedures that enhance students' strengths and assist in the identification of their needs

Accountability for achievement within the context of statewide performance standards, accommodated as appropriate for personal potential and educational experience.,




Therefore, the NDSC affirms that quality inclusive education, as defined by the indicators delineated above, should be a readily available and accessible option for every student with Down syndrome.

January, 1997
Reviewed May, 2005